Background courtesy Windy's Web Design |
Tom Padgett's Child Custody CasePadgett Litigation Update 46 A - DFrom: enthetanews@hotmail.com (A.B.U.S.E.) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Padgett Litigation UPDATE 46 Date: 21 Jun 2002 14:13:20 -0700 Message-ID: <af7713bf.0206211313.4732ad78@posting.google.com> THIS IS SICK...VERY CULT-LIKE....MORE LEGAL HARASSMENT AND "DISCONNECTION" CONTINUE IN WESTERN KENTUCKY! On June 20, 2002, Scientologist Laura Vannoy Padgett, filed a document in the Hopkins Circuit Court civil court proceedings, titled "MOTION TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND VISITATION." The introductory language of the motion acknowledges her son's court ordered extended visitation with his father during the summer. However, she goes on to argue that she's "been informed that there is a bench warrant for his arrest in criminal proceedings (under the SAME judge that she is the complaining witness in that criminal action.) Her argument was; "that she was fearful of sending her 17 year old son to Massachusetts to visit with the Respondent (his Dad,) since he may be arrested and the child would be stranded in Massachusetts until further arrangements could be made." Laura Vannoy's private civil attorney Bill Whitledge, asserted all contact with the father in respect to visitation be severed until the arrest issues are resolved in criminal court matters. Tom was not available for comment. But unidentifided friends and relatives expressed dismay, anguish, and continued fear for motives that are very aberrated from a secular reach and understanding. This motion Laura Vannoy filed, is to be heard in court on July 1, 2002. Although she acknowledges that prior court orders for her to produce her son to his father on June 21st. for 5 weeks, it appears she will not follow those prior Orders in hopes that Judge Boteler will rule in her favor as a personal friend of her parents' and sister's former employer in these newest ploys - all sympathetic to Hubbard scripture. <end> A.B.U.S.E. (425) 795-8518
From: pts_2@webtv.net (Pts 2) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Padgett Litigation UPDATE 46 part B...or whatever! Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 20:09:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <23158-3D13C01D-42@storefull-2276.public.lawson.webtv.net> Well ABUSE: I am NOW "available for comment," and just received this motion via fax & e-mail. In the copy of the motion I received, you neglected to report the line "Said warrant is registered in the National Crime Information Center as well as Massachusetts authorities." Why? So here "I" am for comment. Bring it on oh dear state of the Blue Grass - Kentucky. My e-address is padgett@taxexemptchildabuse.net Again, here's my confession of "crimes committed"..... L. Ron Hubbard wrote: "it's a 'high crime' to publicly depart scientology." I am guilty as sin & as hell of this alleged secular crime. But, why would any state or federal government sanction this Hubbard UFO BS? This newest legal motion is ONLY a desperate ploy from $cienos to accomplish "disconnection" through the back door of devious and nefarious litigious excess. Tom <><><><><><><><><><><> www.WhyAreTheyDead.net
From: pts_2@webtv.net (Pts 2) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Padgett Litigation UPDATE 46 part C Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 07:24:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2181-3D22DED6-2@storefull-2272.public.lawson.webtv.net> I received an e-mail from my Kentucky attorney yesterday informing me that the MOTION TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND VISITATION with my son, was continued (postponed) to July 15th. No reason by the court for the delay was given. This was devastating news, because this cuts out 2 more weeks of court-ordered time with Beau, without any immediate resolution in sight. Normally, I, or any parent for that matter, would go there and get the child since there is a court order. However, with an arrest warrant out (for bogus reasons,) in a separate criminal case in the same jurisdiction, I'd be incarcerated. I've tried to get through to my son by e-mail and by phone but with no success. So in effect, "disconnection" is again in play, this time through the back door. A side note, this civil action #92-CI-00444 was filed on July 29, 1992 by a $cientologist. In just 4 weeks, July 29, 2002, will mark the 10 year anniversary of this litigation. And sadly there is no end in sight. There are still a few hard core L. Ron Hubbard devotees left, still clinging to every teaching, bulletin, and HCO PL in the cult's archives as the proper and ethical course of action and conduct to follow. Hence the creation of www.MadvilleLaw.net to expose such destructive anti-family beliefs and the use of the "legal process" as a weapon, rather than a forum for swift dispute resolution. Tom <><><><><><><><><><><> www.WhyAreTheyDead.net
From: enthetanews@hotmail.com (A.B.U.S.E.) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Padgett Litigation UPDATE 46-d Date: 17 Jul 2002 06:37:38 -0700 Message-ID: <af7713bf.0207170537.49d57d13@posting.google.com> Civil Action # 92-CI-00444 Madisonville, Kentucky - on Monday July 15, 2002, Scientologist Laura Vannoy Padgett's Motion To Temporarily Suspend Visitation between the parties' minor son Beau Padgett and his father Tom Padgett, was postoned again without a rulng one way or the other. Laura, a long standing believer in the Hubbard human behavioral Technology, orginally filed this motion on June 20th to be heard in court on Monday, July 1st claiming that Tom had an arrest warrant out on him and was a criminal listed with the Nat'l Crime Information Center, and that that would be detrimental to their son. Laura Vannoy failed to mention in her civil action motion brief, that she was the sole complaining witness in the criminal action that has born the arrest for her son's father, and she failed to state in her motion brief that the prosecutor who requested the arrest warrant for her in criminal proceedings, was her neighbor in an affluent subdivision in North Madisonville. On July 1, the motion was postponed 2 weeks until July 15th. This second postponement from this past Monday puts the motion on the docket for Monday July 29th. This is 2 days AFTER their son's Court-Ordered 5 week summer time with his father ends. So in effect, she was able to accomplish this new round of family "disconnection" without the court ruling one way or the other and perceive as moot from a "legal" angle. Also July 29, 2002 marks the ten (10) year anniversary of Laura Vannoy Padgett's litigation protraction against her ex Thomas Carter Padgett - an SP enemy declare by cult officials in Nashville, TN's Scientology Celebrity Center. Tom's only comments were; "This is so sad! My efforts to contact my son in the past 3 weeks by phone, e-mail, and regular snail mail have all failed. He's been cut off from me again." Any astute observer of this case can see that Tom and Laura's son turns 18 years old this September 2002, an age where his mother no longer has any legal control over him. Given the deep fear of Laura's losing "CONTROL," it is more than apparent that if she get's Tom arrested (again) and brought back to Kentucky to serve more time in prison for bogus charges, then Beau can't see his father, and the "control" and "disconnection" requirements of Hubbard PTS Technology are still maintained, long after the emancipation age of the child involved. Scientologists are a crafty and clever group of tacticians and strategists. The tragic part here, IS the judge in the case, (Boteler,) is fully aware of what's going on and is condoning this very damaging cultic behavior. PTS in Dianetics & Scientology is defined as a "Potential Trouble Source." More on the Laura Vannoy Padgett filed cases can be found at: www.madvillelaw.net <end> A.B.U.S.E. (425) 795-8518
|