Background courtesy |
Tom Padgett's Child Custody CasePadgett Litigation Update 39From: enthetanews@hotmail.com (A.B.U.S.E.) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Padgett Litigation UPDATE 39 Date: 16 Dec 2001 11:51:16 -0800 Message-ID: <af7713bf.0112161151.602a4813@posting.google.com> In the criminal case # 00-CA-2693-MR, the Kentucky Court of Appeals has yet to issue a ruling on the briefs filed last spring which caused the felony conviction of Tom Padgett without trial by jury. In Case # 92-CI-00444, Scientologist Laura Vannoy Padgett's litigious conduct towards her declared SP ex-husband continues. Briefs were filed by both parties this past October in visitation and child support matters that have been "pending" since as far back as 1996. In a post final brief proceeding, Vannoy's lawyer filed a motion on October 24, 2001, for discovery of non-parties to the her litigation - specifically, a Boston Based Fleet Bank acccount for A.B.U.S.E. set up for the defense funding donations for Tom Padgett. In defense, Padgett's lawyers provided a letter from the Fleet Bank of Massachusetts indicating that he is not a signatore of the account supporting the arguement that if there are no boundries or limitations in the disclosure and discoveryprocess for the Petitioner (Laura,) then the Respondent (Tom,) should enjoy the same expanded discovery of interested parties such as the Scientology Corporations, mal-practice insurance coverage of the court appointed pyschologist that was rendered fraudulent in the case through her licensing board investigations, and even financial discovery of local Western Kentucky officers of the Court who continue to refuse to recuse themselves for a plethora of conflict of interest issues. The rationale here is bilateral discovery of who's operating in the background ON BOTH SIDES, not just favoring the Scientologist. Fleet Bank is also the same financial institution that Scientogists want discovery of Mr. Robert Minton, a non-party in the Lisa McPherson Civil Case in Florida. While the actual banks are just coincidendal, the pattern of cultic behavior continues to be established where Scientologists continue to believe they are above the law in matters of discovery of their critics, detractors,and ex-members who are declared enemies by using prejudiced and tampered with judges in various jurisdictions to "bend" the rules of standard routine discovery and disclosure to favor the cult. On December 4, 2001, the attorney for Tom Padgett filed a motion for pentente lite visitation between he and his minor son for the upcoming Holidays. On September 10, 2001, the minor testified under oath that he didn't want to be "disconnected" from his paternal family members and wanted more time with his dad one-on-one in Massachusetts away from Kentucky. Also on September 10th, Laura Vannoy was ordered by the Court to answer the question of whether or not she was still a practicing member [of] Scientology & Dianetics - purportedly the Modern Science of Mental Health. The relevance of the pointed question goes to rumors created by her lawyer in Court testifying on her behalf that she has left the Church of Scientology sometime going back to 1999, and joined a local Christian Church there in Madisonville, KY. Additionally, it has been discovered that the same spin has been argued on the interent by anonymous posters on IRC channels. Vannoy's lawyer William Whitledge, objected on the grounds that it violated his client's religious rights and freedoms. His objection was overuled and she was instructed by the Court Commissioner to answer the question as a matter of behavior rather that religious beliefs. Her answer under oath was an emphatic "Yes." However, she tesified she didn't want her children disconnected from their father or that he was an SP. But went on state that her children's father was unstable and unpredictable as grounds for the continued visitation restrictions. When ask if she, the Petitioner, had any expert or material witnesses in the behavioral or social sciences, or family counselling role to introduce to back this assertion of hers, the reply was negative. Her lawyer though, continues to interject that Mr. Padgett is a criminal (a felon) and a deadbeat dad as grounds for visitation being continued to be restricted - the same song and dance as OSA operative in Boston, Frank Ofman. On December 12, 2001, the Hopkins Circuit Court Commisioner granted the Respondent's motion and the minor son's expressed wishes for them to spend time together during the upcoming Christmas Holidays in Massachusetts away from Kentucky. Tom has expressed concerns that she will attempt to sabotage that Order and risk being held in contempt of court to continue to covertly apply "disconnection," a manditory policy written By L. Ron Hubbard. <end>A.B.U.S.E.(dedicated to exposing the harm caused by FAIR GAME)(425) 795-8518 |